Telling Better Stories


Some of those who have responded to my previous post on the wrath of God(primarily in person or by phone) seem to have understood me to say that God is not concerned with sin or that there is no response of wrath.

I understand how they could come to that since my first post on this subject was intended primarily to pull our focus away from the satisfaction of God’s wrath as the primary purpose of the cross. I made a case against this perspective not because I don’t believe it has a part in this story, but because for so many of us it has been the ONLY part of the story that seemed to matter.

I do believe that sin and injustice matter to God. I believe that violence and oppression certainly bring about the wrath of God; my friend Luke pointed out the story of Sodom and Gomorra…another good example would be the plagues on Egypt. I have said before, and still believe, that mercy taken to an extreme is injustice to those offended.

I believe that our obstinate desire to continue in sin when faced with the Truth of God, is something which does bring guilt and potentially wrath.

I’d like to talk more about what that means. When we read about the wrath of God being poured out or threatened to be poured out there are two basic categories: 1) evil and violent cultures/people groups and 2) God’s chosen people who continue generation after generation to refuse to worship God alone; who fail to be the people they’re called to be.

Notice that if the evil communities – such as Sodom and Gomora or Egypt – would have repented, then God would have withheld his wrath. Look at Ninevah – Jonah preaches the worst sermon in history and boom, the whole city repents and then, double boom God relents. No sacrifice needed to appease his wrath other than the sacrifice of a broken and contrite heart.

Regarding the wrath poured out on God’s people – a story which is repeated throughout Israel’s history – let’s not forget how often they were given the chance to repent and turn back to God. The message of Jeremiah was that God’s wrath would come in the form of exile and control by a foreign power unless the people turned back to God. God’s wrath was NOT inescapable, it only came about after repeated refusals by His people to listen.

I’m not arguing that Jesus’ crucifixion didn’t serve as the final sacrifice for sin – I think that is absolutely part of what happened. However, I believe that it is false to assert that God is bound by his justice to require a sacrifice and therefore that must have been the primary reason for the cross. If God is bound to satisfy justice, then God is subservient to justice…we should worship justice because it is more powerful than God. But God is love. Love certainly involves seeking justice for others, but love also forgives offenses against itself.

I believe that there are some serious holes in the position that God is bound by his justice and so the pouring out of his wrath on someone (be it on us or Jesus) is central to his nature. While God is certainly just, God is not subject to anything – if so then, again, we should worship that. It is not okay to say that God IS justice and thus he is bound by himself. First of all, while Scripture says that God is just (an adjective) it does not say that God IS Justice (noun) – we’re told that God is Love…not Justice.

One response I’ve heard to this is that love must be just. Love certainly contains a component of justice yet it is also filled with mercy, long-suffering, forgiveness and grace.

Substitutionary atonement fails to acknowledge God’s longstanding history of offering forgiveness to those who have offended him without requiring the taking of life. Hosea 6 reminds us that God“desires mercy, not sacrifice.” In that passage God, through through the prophet, is urging his people to turn back and acknowledge him – they had ALREADY broken their covenant with God and thus justice demanded that they be put out. The entire point of Hosea’s life and ministry was that God is not bound by this expectation of justice. God is willing to set all that aside if his people will remember and return.

Isn’t that precisely what we are called to as well? Paul confronts the church in Corinth for their insistence on getting justice when they’ve been wronged: “The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be cheated?(1 Corinthians 6:7)”

Demanding justice for yourself does not seem to carry the same weight as demanding justice for the weak and the oppressed (assuming you aren’t the weak and oppressed). God is the One who speaks up for justice on behalf of those who cannot speak for themselves and yet where God is concerned he extends mercy and forgiveness.

When God is finally forced to pour out his wrath, he tells the people he will not remain angry forever – God’s wrath is redemptive rather than merely retributive (thanks Nate); God’s wrath is a means rather than an end.

How does Jesus describe God in relation to our “lostness”? Well, most of us are familiar with the three parables of lost things. The lost coin, lost sheep and prodigal son are important parables where Jesus stresses heavily the nature of God – hence three similar stories in quick succession. In these stories we find not a vengeful God of righteous wrath, but a compassionate caretaker, shepherd and father. The shepherd does not require the sheep to be sacrificed and the father does not require the son to become a slave – apparently being lost was punishment enough.

HOWEVER (Galatians 6:7) “Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.” God does take sin very seriously because sin is a component of the larger brokenness that plagues all of creation – a creation that is beloved by God and which God is even now working to restore and heal. Sin, brokenness and evil are true enemies of life, if that is what we sow then that is what we will reap.

What if that is what the wrath of God really is? Eventually God allows us to remain in the lostness we brought on ourselves. It isn’t that God brings about some vicious torture because his sense of honor has been accosted. He invites us to return but if we continue to refuse; if we continue to willingly sow evil, then how can we not reap destruction?

This shift in understanding does is not devalue the damage of sin or the need for a Savior. However, it does demand that we recognize how we’ve made sin the point for too long. Sin is only the point if our genesis (beginning) was in Genesis 3. But the fall of humanity is not the foundation of this story, the point is the power of a good creator God speaking all things into existence and being very pleased with his good creation (Genesis 1). The point is that this God desires to be in close communion with that which he has made and he will cross any chasm to rescue us from death.

Sin is a character in this story, but it is not the main character. The wrath of God is a potential subplot, but not the climax or the resolution. The wrath of God is no more central to this story than not failing a class is the central reason to study in school or gaining nutrients for physical survival is the primary reason to share a meal with friends.

God is a just God; he demands justice for those who are oppressed and he will not allow those who continue to defy him to remain unpunished. But God IS love. God is the One who is at work in healing broken lives and restoring damaged relationships. This is the central message of the cross – a new power and a new kingdom are available. No longer will the oppressive regimes of this world define power. The Kingdom of God is at hand, it is for everyone and it has a whole new definition of life.

The barriers have been torn down; the enemy has been vanquished and the invitation to enter into life has been given. This is not primarily about a loan shark collecting a debt, this is about a father running to meet his child on the road. Falling on his knees, kissing and embracing his beloved, putting rings on fingers and coats on shoulders and throwing a feast to celebrate the restoration of the father’s broken heart.

That is a much better story.


Posted on December 10, 2008, in Love, wrath and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 14 Comments.

  1. Maybe we have forgotten or are unwilling to accept that “being lost was punishment enough.”

  2. Good point Chris, I am already in exile from my True home and that makes it exponentially painful when I realize that I have wondered away from the One comfort we carry with us as a reminder of that home.

    What I took away from your “Wrath” post, Bret was that if the message being delivered was a “reaching out” to those who are disenfranchised with church experiences or those who have never had such an experience, the Gospel that Jesus brings would be the more effective approach. On the other hand, to those like myself who have times where contentment or sin can set in, it is the message of God’s perfect justice that has the ability to bring about the “realization” that I have walked away from my only comfort and the eternal life or death urgency of my acknowledgment and repentance of my disobedience.

  3. Or, if I may reference a hippie tune…”A time for Love, a tiiime for Wrath”….to everything turn, turn, turn. Both are important concepts for all Christians to hear and know, because I feel that both messages have been given to us through the Word of God, revealing to us more of our unknowable Creator.

  4. Ecclesiastes 3 (“There is a time for everything and a season for every activity under heaven…”)has been heavy on my heart the past few days. Funny that you mention the “hippie tune,” Steve. 🙂 With that in mind Bret, though it is exhausting for me to watch you (and listen to you!) wrestle through things like this — there is a time for everything. You’ve uprooted and torn down and wept, etc… through this wrath thing, and it looks like you’re coming through on the other side. Of course part of the answer is something as simple as “being lost was punishment enough.” His simplicity is one of the things that I find most beautiful about God’s wisdom. Continue to struggle and wrestle and think and study, babe, but don’t forget to plant and build and laugh and dance on the way…

  5. Chris, Steve and Rachel,

    Thanks for commenting!

    Rachel, thank you for putting up with my incessant and obsessive processing – your patience is really amazing!

    Steve, regarding the wrath message toward contented Christians. I agree with you, I think it is certainly more appropriate in that context – that is closer to the prophetic context we find in the OT for sure. And that’s part of the frustration I think; it is rarely internal apathy being addressed in the contemporary “wrath of God” message.

    I just spent some time with a couple friends discussing this, one of whom has been studying the book of Amos with a group for a while now. The big picture that he has drawn from that study (of a very wrath and punishment heavy book) is that the wrath, over and over and over, has been a call for God’s people to return to him. Again, the wrath is meant to function redemptively (bringing us back) rather than retributively (merely exacting justice for wrongdoing).

    Thanks again for your comments.

  6. Rachel – Do you really think it wise for Bret to dance?

  7. I’ll answer that one…No. It is not. Ever.

    And why are you “American Bandstand” now?

  8. …a hidden “dancing” reference…

  9. Ok, I’m a latecomer to this conversation, but thought I’d chime in anyway. I have no time to go finding a bunch of texts to buttress a position, so I will assume that we all share a common general knowledge of the same story. Anyway, I have two questions regarding Bret’s position, which may be completely right, I just have some questions.

    1) Is God’s wrath passive — leaving us to the consequences of sin, but without active intervention on his part? “Passive wrath” sounds like an oxymoron.

    2) Was the death of Christ necessary? Jesus prayed that the cup be taken from him if there was any other way. Did the Father say, “I could do it another way–but this one shows the depth of our love better than the others”? Or was there really no other way that we could be saved?

  10. To Whom I May Concern: my only interest is the purchase – a reasonable (no more than $45.00) price – of The Prodigal Son – in color, size 12″ X 18″. If this is not possible, a yes or no is reasonable. Thank you

  1. Pingback: Chatty Cathy’s Thousand Word Reply « Deep Wells

  2. Pingback: The Return of the prodigal son « EXODIANS

  3. Pingback: Chatty Cathy’s Thousand Word Reply | Missional Monks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: